Goodwin Procter LLP vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Goodwin Procter | Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay winsTie | $225,000 | $225,000 |
| Higher wins | $4.24M (wins this category) | $1.65M |
| Lower rank wins | #31 (wins this category) | #32 |
| Lower rank wins | #21 (wins this category) | #53 |
| Higher wins | $2.72B (wins this category) | $1.22B |
| More lawyers wins | 1,666 (wins this category) | 1,000 |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 10 | 19 (wins this category) |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables winsTie | 6 tables | 6 tables |
| 2L OpensEarlier date winsNot Comparable | Not announcedOur 2028 summer program application will open on November 2, 2026. | ClosedSummer 2028 |
| 1L OpensEarlier date wins | Nov 2, 2026Summer 2027 | No 1L Program |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Est. 2017 · Merger
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 10 offices worldwide.
Est. 2017 · Merger
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Environment. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP#32
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP#53
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP11 records
- #31
- #21
- 18 records
- Vault rank
- #32
- Am Law rank
- #53
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 11 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP$225,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP$1.65M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP$1.22B
Revenue per lawyer
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP$1.28M
- $225,000
- $4.24M
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.65M
- Firm revenue
- $1.22B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.28M
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP2,000
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP1.5:1
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,650
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP~1,000
Offices
- Goodwin Procter LLP10
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP19
- 1,950
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~1,650
- Offices
- 10
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 1.5:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 19
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP97%
Class size
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP37 (year not confirmed)
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPCentralized staffing
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPNo
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- Centralized staffing
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 97%
- Class size
- 37 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- No
1L program
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPNo 1L summer program
1L applications open
- Goodwin Procter LLPNov 2, 2026
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPNot Reported
2L applications open
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot announced
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPExpected early December 2026
2L deadline
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot announced
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPNot Reported
- 1L program
- Not Reported
- 1L applications open
- Nov 2, 2026
- 2L applications open
- Not announced
- 2L deadline
- Not announced
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Expected early December 2026
- 2L deadline
- Not Reported
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 4
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPBand 4
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Goodwin Procter
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Goodwin Procter
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Goodwin Procter
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
- Latham & Watkins vs. Goodwin Procter
- Latham & Watkins vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Goodwin Procter
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Goodwin Procter
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Goodwin Procter and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer for sources and dates.