Skip to main content

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP

Side-by-side on the metrics that actually drive the student's call. Sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Est. 1931

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #15 / AmLaw #29. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Corporate Governance, and Environment: Mainly Transactional. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.

Goodwin Procter LLP

Est. 1912 · Boston

Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, AmLaw #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 10 offices worldwide.

Rankings & prestige
Vault rank
#15
AmLaw rank
#29
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
7 records
Vault rank
#31
AmLaw rank
#21
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
18 records
Compensation
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$5.59M
Firm revenue
$2.08B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.74M
First-year comp
$255,000+
Profits per partner
$4.24M
Firm revenue
$2.72B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.63M
Work & scale
Billable target
-
Partnership track
-
US associates per partner
-
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,200
Offices
16
Billable target
1,950
Partnership track
-
US associates per partner
-
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,650
Offices
10
Summer program
Offer rate
-
Class size
-
How associates get work
Centralized staffing
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Offer rate
100%
Class size
67 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Centralized staffing
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Chambers by practice, market and year

Shared results are listed once. Green marks only a lower reported Chambers band for the same exact practice, market and year. Records with a missing year or market are not compared. Historical records are retained; individual ranking verification status is not available.

Shared rankings

Private Equity: Buyouts · Massachusetts · 2026Band 2
Technology · Nationwide · 2026Band 3

Rank differences

Corporate/M&AMassachusetts · 2026
Band 3
Band 1
Life SciencesNationwide · 2026
Band 4
Band 1
Securities: Regulation: AdvisoryNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
AntitrustDistrict of Columbia · 2026
Band 2
Band 5
Banking & FinanceNationwide · 2026
Band 2
Band 4
Corporate/M&ANationwide · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 5 · Elite
Intellectual Property: AppellateNationwide · 2026
Band 3
Band 2
Life Sciences: IP/Patent LitigationCalifornia · 2026
Band 3
Band 2
Litigation: General CommercialNationwide · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Litigation: General CommercialNew York · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Litigation: SecuritiesNew York · 2026
Band 2
Band 4
Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government InvestigationsNew York · 2026
Band 4 · Elite
Band 2 · Elite

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values shown as “-”.