Skip to main content

Dickinson Wright vs. Dykema Gossett vs. Clark Hill

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Dickinson Wright

Est. 1878

Dickinson Wright is a mid-size firm of ~542 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.

Dykema Gossett

Est. 1926

Dykema Gossett is a ~379-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate/M&A, Energy & Natural Resources, and Litigation: General Commercial. Operates from 12 offices worldwide.

Clark Hill

Est. 1890

Clark Hill is a mid-size firm of ~678 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance; Band 2 in Energy & Natural Resources and Immigration. Operates from 32 offices worldwide.

Rankings & prestige
Not Reported
#121
8 records
Vault rank
Not Reported
Am Law rank
#151
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
5 records
Vault rank
Not Reported
Am Law rank
#113
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
1 record
Compensation
$225,000
$1.05M
$397.82M
Revenue per lawyer
$734K
First-Year Comp
$225,000
Profits Per Partner
$872K
Firm revenue
$273.11M
Revenue per lawyer
$721K
First-Year Comp
$225,000
Profits Per Partner
$739K
Firm revenue
$436.80M
Revenue per lawyer
$644K
Work & scale
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
~550
Offices
18
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~400
Offices
12
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~700
Offices
32
Summer Program
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
Not Reported
Yes
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Not Reported
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Rank differences

Litigation: General CommercialMichigan · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 4
Employee Benefits & Executive CompensationMichigan · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3
Corporate/M&AMichigan · 2026
Band 2
Band 2
Band 4
Labor & EmploymentMichigan · 2026
Band 3
Band 3
Band 2
Cannabis LawNationwide · 2026
Band 3
Band 4
Band 3

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.