Skip to main content

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP vs. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP vs. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm
Rankings & prestige

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#40
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#60
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#34
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#65
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips#106

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP17 records
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP7 records
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips1 record
Compensation

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$225,000+
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$225,000+
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips$225,000

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$4.20M
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$2.89M
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips$2.96M

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.78B
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$939.12M
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips$509.70M

Revenue per lawyer

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.75M
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$1.37M
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips$1.75M
Work & scale

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP1.4:1
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP0.6:1
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP~1,000
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP~700
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips~300

Offices

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP27
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP22
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips12
Summer Program

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP100%
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP94.1%
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

Class size

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP38 (year not confirmed)
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPFree market
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported

  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPYes
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNo
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsNot Reported
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Rank differences

Real EstateCalifornia: Northern · 2026
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 2
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsBand 3
Real EstateCalifornia: Southern · 2026
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 4
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3
  • Manatt, Phelps & PhillipsBand 4

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

See which of these firms are open on the Job Board

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.