Skip to main content

Stoel Rives vs. Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP vs. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Stoel Rives

Est. 1907

Stoel Rives is a ~321-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A.

Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP

Est. 1912

Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #24. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Construction. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Est. 1944 · Seattle

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.

Rankings & prestige
Not Reported
#139
19 records
Vault rank
#24
Am Law rank
#51
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
25 records
Vault rank
#74
Am Law rank
#90
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
21 records
Compensation
$225,000
$1.44M
$317.38M
Revenue per lawyer
$990K
First-Year Comp
$255,000+
Profits Per Partner
$1.99M
Firm revenue
$1.28B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.26M
First-Year Comp
$225,000+
Profits Per Partner
$1.39M
Firm revenue
$674.20M
Revenue per lawyer
$1.06M
Work & scale
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~300
Offices
1
Billable target
2,000
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,000
Offices
16
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~650
Offices
9
Summer Program
Not Reported
Class size
20 (2025)
Not Reported
Not Reported
Offer rate
100%
Class size
38 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Offer rate
100%
Class size
25 (2026)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Shared rankings

Bankruptcy/Restructuring · Washington · 2026Band 2

Rank differences

Corporate/M&AOregon · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 3
Corporate/M&AWashington · 2026
Band 3
Band 1
Band 1
Employee Benefits & Executive CompensationWashington · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 1
EnvironmentWashington · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 3
Labor & EmploymentWashington · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 1
Litigation: General CommercialOregon · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 2
Litigation: General CommercialWashington · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 1
Natural Resources & EnvironmentAlaska · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 2
EnvironmentOregon · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 2
Intellectual PropertyWashington · 2026
Band 4
Band 1
Band 2
Real EstateWashington · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 2
Real Estate: Zoning/Land UseOregon · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 2

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.