Skip to main content

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease vs. Baker & Hostetler LLP vs. Porter Wright Morris & Arthur

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease

Est. 1909

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease is a ~364-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Corporate/M&A, and Energy & Natural Resources.

Baker & Hostetler LLP

Est. 1916 · Cleveland

Baker & Hostetler LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, founded in Cleveland, OH. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Advertising: Transactional & Regulatory, and Bankruptcy/Restructuring. Operates from 20 offices worldwide.

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur

-

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur is a ~187-attorney boutique. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 2 in Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, Energy & Natural Resources, and Immigration.

Rankings & prestige
Not Reported
#126
5 records
Vault rank
#63
Am Law rank
#59
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
18 records
Vault rank
Not Reported
Am Law rank
#192
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
Not Reported
Compensation
$225,000
$1.44M
$373.79M
Revenue per lawyer
$1.03M
First-Year Comp
$225,000
Profits Per Partner
$2.48M
Firm revenue
$1.13B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.10M
First-Year Comp
$225,000
Profits Per Partner
$1.18M
Firm revenue
$153.09M
Revenue per lawyer
$819K
Work & scale
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~350
Offices
1
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,050
Offices
20
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~200
Offices
1
Summer Program
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Offer rate
97.4%
Class size
44 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
No
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Not Reported
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Rank differences

Corporate/M&AOhio: South & Central · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 3
Banking & FinanceOhio · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3
Bankruptcy/RestructuringOhio · 2026
Band 3
Band 1
Band 3
Employee Benefits & Executive CompensationOhio · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 2
Energy & Natural ResourcesOhio · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 2
Labor & EmploymentOhio: South & Central · 2026
Band 3
Band 1
Band 2
Litigation: General CommercialOhio · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 4
Intellectual PropertyOhio · 2026
Band 3
Band 2
Band 3
Real EstateOhio · 2026
Band 2
Band 2
Band 3

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.