Skip to main content

Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP

Est. 1912

Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #24. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Construction. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Est. 1967

Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP

Est. 2018 · Merger

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Corporate/M&A, and Environment. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.

Rankings & prestige
#24
#51
25 records
Vault rank
#55
Am Law rank
#17
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
31 records
Vault rank
#99
Am Law rank
#67
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
8 records
Compensation
$255,000+
$1.99M
$1.28B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.26M
First-year comp
Varies by office
Profits per partner
$2.90M
Firm revenue
$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.04M
First-year comp
$200,000
Profits per partner
$1.41M
Firm revenue
$912.07M
Revenue per lawyer
$1.17M
Work & scale
2,000
Not Reported
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,000
Offices
16
Billable target
Varies by office
Partnership track
9 years
US associates per partner
0.7:1
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~3,200
Offices
52
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,200
Offices
19
Summer program
100%
Class size
38 (year not confirmed)
Not Reported
Yes
Offer rate
95%
Class size
92 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
20 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
No
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Rank differences

RetailNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 4
Corporate/M&AColorado · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
Band 3
EnvironmentNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
Band 4
Litigation: General CommercialArizona · 2026
Band 2
Band 4
Band 4
Privacy & Data SecurityNationwide · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 4 · Elite
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Product Liability & Mass TortsNationwide · 2026
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Band 3 · Elite
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Litigation: General CommercialNationwide · 2026
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Band 4 · Elite
Band 5 · Highly Regarded

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.