Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Hinckley Allen
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.
Est. 1933
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. is a mid-size firm of ~527 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Healthcare, and Immigration.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1906
Hinckley Allen is a ~160-attorney boutique. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Intellectual Property.
- #77
- #83
- 5 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #200
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- $225,000+
- $2.75M
- $767.80M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.46M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.03M
- Firm revenue
- $142.82M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $891K
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~550
- Offices
- 8
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,200
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~150
- Offices
- 1
- 100%
- Class size
- 19 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.