Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP vs. Seyfarth Shaw LLP vs. Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.
Est. 1868
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a mid-size firm of ~684 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy: Nuclear (Regulatory & Litigation), and Food & Beverages: Alcohol. Operates from 21 offices worldwide.
Est. 1945 · Chicago
Seyfarth Shaw LLP is a mid-size firm of ~913 attorneys, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Labor & Employment, and Retail. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1979
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo is a ~264-attorney firm. Operates from 10 offices worldwide.
- #60
- #65
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #89
- Am Law rank
- #63
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #182
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- Not Reported
- $225,000+
- $2.89M
- $939.12M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.37M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.90M
- Firm revenue
- $990.78M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.09M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.22M
- Firm revenue
- $174.37M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $661K
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- ~700
- Offices
- 21
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~900
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~250
- Offices
- 10
- 94.1%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- No
- Offer rate
- 86.4%
- Class size
- 24 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.