Skip to main content

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP vs. Sidley Austin LLP

Side-by-side on the metrics that actually drive the student's call. Sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

Est. 1819

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is a mid-size firm of ~572 attorneys, Vault #1 / AmLaw #50. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Capital Markets: Investment Grade Debt: Issuer Counsel, and Capital Markets: Investment Grade Debt: Manager Counsel.

Sidley Austin LLP

Est. 1866 · Chicago

Sidley Austin LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #11 / AmLaw #6, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Securitization: ABS.

Rankings & prestige
Vault rank
#1
AmLaw rank
#50
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
15 records
Vault rank
#11
AmLaw rank
#6
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
29 records
Compensation
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$7.20M
Firm revenue
$1.29B
Revenue per lawyer
$2.26M
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$5.97M
Firm revenue
$3.74B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.83M
Work & scale
Billable target
-
Partnership track
7 years
US associates per partner
3.3:1
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~550
Offices
3
Billable target
2,000
Partnership track
-
US associates per partner
1.9:1
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~2,300
Offices
20
Summer program
Offer rate
100%
Class size
143 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Rotation
Specific practice area
Yes
Offer rate
-
Class size
198 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Free market
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Chambers by practice, market and year

Shared results are listed once. Green marks only a lower reported Chambers band for the same exact practice, market and year. Records with a missing year or market are not compared. Historical records are retained; individual ranking verification status is not available.

Shared rankings

Litigation: General Commercial · Nationwide · 2026Band 2 · The Elite
Securities: Litigation · Nationwide · 2026Band 2
Capital Markets: Equity: Issuer Counsel · Nationwide · 2026Band 3

Rank differences

AntitrustNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 4
AntitrustNew York · 2026
Band 1
Band 5
Capital Markets: Investment Grade Debt: Issuer CounselNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
Capital Markets: Investment Grade Debt: Manager CounselNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
Corporate/M&ANationwide · 2026
Band 1 · Elite
Band 4 · Elite
Corporate/M&ANew York · 2026
Band 1 · Elite
Band 1 · Highly Regarded
Litigation: General CommercialNew York · 2026
Band 1 · Elite
Band 4 · Elite
Litigation: SecuritiesNew York · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Securities: Regulation: AdvisoryNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
TaxNew York · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
Tax: Corporate & FinanceNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Banking & FinanceNationwide · 2026
Band 2
Band 3

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values shown as “-”.