Skip to main content

Sidley Austin LLP vs. White & Case LLP

Side-by-side on the metrics that actually drive the student's call. Sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Sidley Austin LLP

Est. 1866 · Chicago

Sidley Austin LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #11 / AmLaw #6, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Securitization: ABS.

White & Case LLP

Est. 1901 · New York

White & Case LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #18 / AmLaw #9, founded in New York, NY. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy Litigation, and Capital Markets: Securitization: Whole Business.

Rankings & prestige
Vault rank
#11
AmLaw rank
#6
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
29 records
Vault rank
#18
AmLaw rank
#9
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
8 records
Compensation
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$5.97M
Firm revenue
$3.74B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.83M
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$4.41M
Firm revenue
$3.59B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.36M
Work & scale
Billable target
2,000
Partnership track
-
US associates per partner
1.9:1
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~2,300
Offices
20
Billable target
2,000
Partnership track
-
US associates per partner
-
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~2,650
Offices
43
Summer program
Offer rate
-
Class size
198 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Free market
Specific practice area
Case by Case
Offer rate
-
Class size
82 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
-
Specific practice area
No
Chambers by practice, market and year

Shared results are listed once. Green marks only a lower reported Chambers band for the same exact practice, market and year. Records with a missing year or market are not compared. Historical records are retained; individual ranking verification status is not available.

Shared rankings

International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy · Nationwide · 2026Band 2
Litigation: General Commercial · Nationwide · 2026Band 2 · The Elite
Offshore Energy · Nationwide · 2026Band 2
Projects: LNG · Nationwide · 2026Band 2
Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional · Nationwide · 2026Band 2
Capital Markets: Debt & Equity · Texas · 2026Band 3
Corporate Governance · Nationwide · 2026Band 3
Real Estate · Illinois · 2026Band 3
Technology · Nationwide · 2026Band 3
Antitrust · District of Columbia · 2026Band 4
Corporate/M&A · Nationwide · 2026Band 4 · The Elite
Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation · California · 2026Band 4
Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy · Nationwide · 2026Band 5

Rank differences

Corporate/M&A & Private EquityIllinois · 2026
Band 1
Band 5
Energy TransitionNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 3
International ArbitrationNationwide · 2026
Band 4 · Elite
Band 1 · Elite
Private Equity: Buyouts: Mid-MarketNationwide · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
AntitrustNew York · 2026
Band 5
Band 2
Banking & FinanceCalifornia · 2026
Band 4
Band 2
Banking & FinanceNationwide · 2026
Band 3
Band 2
Banking & FinanceNew York · 2026
Band 4
Band 2
Bankruptcy/RestructuringIllinois · 2026
Band 2
Band 3
Bankruptcy/RestructuringNationwide · 2026
Band 3 · Elite
Band 2 · Elite
Bankruptcy/RestructuringNew York · 2026
Band 5 · Elite
Band 2 · Elite
Corporate/M&ATexas · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 5 · Elite

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values shown as “-”.