White & Case LLP vs. Morrison & Foerster LLP
Side-by-side on the metrics that actually drive the student's call. Sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.
Est. 1901 · New York
White & Case LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #18 / AmLaw #9, founded in New York, NY. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy Litigation, and Capital Markets: Securitization: Whole Business.
Est. 1883
Morrison & Foerster LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, AmLaw #42. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Artificial Intelligence, Corporate/M&A: Deals in Asia, and FCPA. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.
- Vault rank
- #18
- AmLaw rank
- #9
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 8 records
- Vault rank
- #27
- AmLaw rank
- #42
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 15 records
- First-year comp
- $225,000+
- Profits per partner
- $4.41M
- Firm revenue
- $3.59B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.36M
- First-year comp
- $225,000+
- Profits per partner
- $3.29M
- Firm revenue
- $1.54B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.51M
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- -
- US associates per partner
- -
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,650
- Offices
- 43
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- -
- US associates per partner
- -
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 16
- Offer rate
- -
- Class size
- 82 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- -
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.6%
- Class size
- 78 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- -
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Shared results are listed once. Green marks only a lower reported Chambers band for the same exact practice, market and year. Records with a missing year or market are not compared. Historical records are retained; individual ranking verification status is not available.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
Data sources: Vault 2027, AmLaw 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values shown as “-”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. White & Case
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. White & Case
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. White & Case
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Latham & Watkins vs. White & Case
- Latham & Watkins vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. White & Case
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. White & Case
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Morrison & Foerster
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see White & Case and Morrison & Foerster for sources and dates.