Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Spencer Fane vs. Dentons US LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Spencer Fane
Est. 1879
- Dentons US LLP
Est. 2013 · Merger
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1879
Spencer Fane is a mid-size firm of ~750 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate/Commercial, Healthcare, and Insurance. Operates from 38 offices worldwide.
Est. 2013 · Merger
Dentons US LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #18. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Cannabis Law, and Capital Markets: Securitization: RMBS. Operates from 53 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLP#62
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Spencer Fane#118
- Dentons US LLP#18
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Spencer Fane5 records
- Dentons US LLP22 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #118
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 5 records
- Vault rank
- #62
- Am Law rank
- #18
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Spencer Fane$225,000
- Dentons US LLP$225,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Spencer Fane$830K
- Dentons US LLP$959K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Spencer Fane$404.00M
- Dentons US LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Spencer Fane$696K
- Dentons US LLP$506K
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $830K
- Firm revenue
- $404.00M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $696K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $959K
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $506K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Spencer Fane~750
- Dentons US LLP~5,750
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Spencer Fane38
- Dentons US LLP53
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~750
- Offices
- 38
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~5,750
- Offices
- 53
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLP61 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Spencer FaneNot Reported
- Dentons US LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Spencer FaneYes
- Dentons US LLPYes
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 61 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Spencer FaneBand 1
- Dentons US LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Spencer FaneBand 3
- Dentons US LLPBand 1
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.