Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP vs. Dickinson Wright
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1856
A transatlantic full-service firm with U.S. strength in corporate, litigation, real estate, intellectual property, and regulated-industry work.
Est. 1878
Dickinson Wright is a mid-size firm of ~542 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #76
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 12 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #121
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 8 records
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $757K
- Firm revenue
- $828.04M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $688K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.05M
- Firm revenue
- $397.82M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $734K
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,200
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,300
- Offices
- 42
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~550
- Offices
- 18
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.