Skip to main content

Reed Smith LLP vs. K&L Gates LLP vs. Dentons US LLP

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Reed Smith LLP

Est. 1877

Reed Smith LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #40. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Energy & Natural Resources. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.

K&L Gates LLP

Est. 2007 · Merger

K&L Gates LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #48. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 17 offices worldwide.

Dentons US LLP

Est. 2013 · Merger

Dentons US LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #18. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Cannabis Law, and Capital Markets: Securitization: RMBS. Operates from 54 offices worldwide.

Rankings & prestige
#59
#40
14 records
Vault rank
#49
Am Law rank
#48
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
14 records
Vault rank
#62
Am Law rank
#18
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
22 records
Compensation
$225,000+
$2.02M
$1.59B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.11M
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$1.63M
Firm revenue
$1.37B
Revenue per lawyer
$808K
First-year comp
$225,000+
Profits per partner
$959K
Firm revenue
$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
$506K
Work & scale
2,000
Not Reported
1:1
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,600
Offices
19
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,700
Offices
17
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~5,750
Offices
54
Summer program
Not Reported
Class size
41 (year not confirmed)
Not Reported
No
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
61 (year not confirmed)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Rank differences

Litigation: General CommercialPennsylvania: Pittsburgh & Surrounds · 2026
Band 1
Band 1
Band 3
Corporate/M&A & Private EquityPennsylvania: Pittsburgh & Surrounds · 2026
Band 2
Band 1
Band 2
Real EstatePennsylvania: Pittsburgh & Surrounds · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 2
HealthcareNationwide · 2026
Band 2 · Elite
Band 2 · Highly Regarded
Band 4 · Elite
Litigation: General CommercialNationwide · 2026
Band 3 · Highly Regarded
Band 4 · Highly Regarded
Band 1 · Highly Regarded

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.