Skip to main content

Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP vs. Burr & Forman vs. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm

Swipe sideways to see every firm, or focus the comparison and use the arrow keys.

Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP

Est. 1856

A transatlantic full-service firm with U.S. strength in corporate, litigation, real estate, intellectual property, and regulated-industry work.

Burr & Forman

Est. 1905 · Birmingham

Burr & Forman is a ~366-attorney firm, founded in Birmingham, AL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 21 offices worldwide.

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Est. 1897

Southeastern roots with a broad national platform and a mix of corporate, litigation, real estate, healthcare, and public-policy work.

Rankings & prestige
Not Reported
#76
12 records
Vault rank
Not Reported
Am Law rank
#147
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
7 records
Vault rank
Not Reported
Am Law rank
#60
Reported Chambers Band 1 records
13 records
Compensation
Not Reported
$757K
$828.04M
Revenue per lawyer
$688K
First-Year Comp
$225,000
Profits Per Partner
$956K
Firm revenue
$285.76M
Revenue per lawyer
$782K
First-Year Comp
Not Reported
Profits Per Partner
$2.51M
Firm revenue
$1.05B
Revenue per lawyer
$1.01M
Work & scale
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
~1,300
Offices
42
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~350
Offices
21
Billable target
Not Reported
Partnership track
Not Reported
US associates per partner
Not Reported
Firm size (rounded to 50)
~1,050
Offices
37
Summer Program
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Offer rate
Not Reported
Class size
Not Reported
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Offer rate
79.5%
Class size
88 (2025)
How associates get work
Not Reported
Specific practice area
Yes
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Shared rankings

Banking & Finance · South Carolina · 2026Band 1

Rank differences

Corporate/M&ASouth Carolina · 2026
Band 3
Band 3
Band 1
Intellectual PropertyNorth Carolina · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3
Litigation: General CommercialSouth Carolina · 2026
Band 3
Band 3
Band 1
Real EstateSouth Carolina · 2026
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.