Practice Areas
How to choose a BigLaw practice area
You do not need a permanent practice identity before recruiting. Build a hypothesis about the work you may enjoy, then test it through assignments, classes, and honest conversations.

Penn Carey Law Class of 2027 · Updated Oct 16, 2026 · 5 min read
You do not need to know your practice area before you start, and nobody expects you to. This article is about the process: how to form a guess, test it, and change it. For what the day-to-day work of each group looks like, use the individual practice guides linked below.
A practice area is a category of legal work, such as M&A, commercial litigation, antitrust, restructuring, tax, or healthcare regulatory work. Your goal before and during the summer is a hypothesis you can test, not a permanent professional identity.
Start with tasks, not subjects
Practice descriptions focus on subject matter. Fit usually comes from tasks.
Ask whether the work involves more:
- drafting agreements;
- legal research and briefs;
- negotiation;
- factual investigation;
- project management;
- quantitative or financial analysis;
- client counseling;
- regulatory interpretation; or
- oral advocacy.
You may love the idea of technology law and dislike the tasks in the specific technology group at your target office. The reverse also happens: a subject that sounds dry can involve work you naturally enjoy.
If the broad split between disputes and deals is your first question, read litigation vs. transactional work. It covers that comparison in detail, so this article does not repeat it.
Compare pace and control
No BigLaw practice guarantees balance. Some groups are more predictable than others, but team, client, staffing, and market conditions matter as much as the label on the practice.
Ask lawyers:
- What creates the busiest weeks?
- How far in advance do you know?
- What work arrives unexpectedly?
- Can matters be staffed around existing commitments?
"How many hours do you work?" is useful. "How much control do you have over when those hours happen?" is often better. For the hours side of the job, see BigLaw billable hours explained.
Look at how the group is staffed
The same practice can feel different across firms and offices because staffing changes the experience. Some groups use large teams with clear layers. Others put juniors directly with partners. Some work crosses offices, and some lean heavily on specialists.
Think about whether you prefer:
- several matters or one enormous matter;
- a stable team or changing teams;
- formal processes or entrepreneurial staffing;
- deep specialization or variety; and
- independent drafting or constant collaboration.
Remember that the group you can actually join is the one in your target office. See how to differentiate BigLaw firms and BigLaw markets explained for how offices differ.
Use your background without being trapped by it
A finance background can make corporate or restructuring work easier to follow. Science can help in life sciences or patent practices. Government experience can support regulatory interests.
That is an advantage, not a command. You are allowed to choose something new. Use the background to form questions instead:
"I enjoyed analyzing financial statements before law school. Which corporate groups use that skill most often at the junior level?"
Be careful with exit options
Different practices can lead toward companies, government agencies, smaller firms, specialist roles, or other legal work. Exit options matter if you have a likely destination.
Do not commit to years of daily work because one hypothetical exit sounds attractive. Skills, relationships, and performance also shape opportunities. Ask where associates from the group have actually gone, not where they theoretically could go. More on this in exit options after BigLaw.
Use a scorecard during the summer
After each assignment, record:
- What was the task?
- What part did I enjoy?
- What part drained me?
- Did I like the pace?
- Did I understand why the work mattered?
- Did I want the next level of responsibility?
- Was my reaction about the practice or the person assigning it?
Do this before the summer ends. Memory tends to turn one exciting event into the entire practice. The summer associate guide covers how to get varied assignments in the first place.
Questions to ask lawyers
- What did you do yesterday?
- What changes between a first-year and fifth-year associate?
- Which personalities tend to enjoy the group?
- What is the least glamorous recurring task?
- How do juniors receive feedback?
- What surprised you after joining?
- What are common exits from this office's group?
If a lawyer cannot describe the work without relying on words like sophisticated and dynamic, keep asking.
You can remain undecided
In interviews, say something like:
"I am still exploring, but I am most interested in corporate and restructuring because I like business problems and want to compare deal work with a practice that also involves disputes. I am looking for a summer program where I can test both."
That is honest and directional. Choose a practice after enough evidence, not because a recruiting event made one group look glamorous. The strongest decision is a current best fit with permission to change later.
When you have a shortlist, read the guides for corporate, antitrust, and restructuring, or try the practice-area fit tool. Then validate the result through real assignments and conversations.
Save this guide
Keep it in your free account and get email alerts before recruiting deadlines.
Firms open summer 2028 applications on their own schedules, and new ones open every week.
Keep Reading
BigLaw salary scale in 2026, including summer associate pay
Market scale is a benchmark, not a promise from every firm. Here is how base salary, class year, bonuses, offices, and summer associate pay fit together.
The honest roadmap from law school to BigLaw
The path is earlier and stranger than most incoming students realize. Here is the timeline, from the summer before 1L through your first day at a firm, with your school's calendar in charge of the dates.
ABA Formal Opinion 512: What Law Students Should Know About Lawyers Using AI
ABA Formal Opinion 512 does not ban AI. It says lawyers using generative AI still owe duties of competence, confidentiality, communication, supervision, candor, and reasonable fees.